IBM has a TV ad campaign going on right now that is touting the incredible capabilities of its Watson supercomputer (you remember, the cyborg that won on Jeopardy! four years ago). The TV spots all show the ways in which Watson is going to assist knowledge workers to do something incredible and thus make the future better. I wrote about this myself in the blog post “You can be smarter than you think.”
The
commercial about radiology is typical of the Watson series. The message goes
like this (I’ll paraphrase): “Radiologists have to analyze thousands of x-rays,
looking for tiny indicators of abnormality. Now Watson can assist with that analysis,
enabling them to do it faster, better, with less
mistakes etc…” It sure sounds great.
But
let me now tell you what is really going on in this commercial, and you’re not
going to like it. Whether IBM admits it or not, or whether they’ve even thought
through the consequences, Watson is learning the job of radiology not just to
assist the radiologists, but to ultimately replace them altogether. Make no
mistake: once Watson learns this very technical, complex skill, the
supercomputer will be able to analyze not thousands of x-rays but millions per
day, with a better accuracy rating and at a far lower cost per patient than can
be done now by those slow, highly-educated (and highly-paid) radiologists, who
do things like getting tired and going on vacation, and going home at the end
of the day. Once Watson comes up to speed, which will be very soon, those
radiology jobs – and the radiologists who fill them – will be… gone.
I’ve
just finished reading a book that everyone should read. It’s called “Rise of
the Robots” by Martin Ford, and it paints a very grim picture of our future, in
which automation, robots and smart software take over job after job, and do
things better and cheaper than the humans they’ll replace. The book’s subtitle
says it all: “Technology and the threat of a jobless future.”
Now
I know you’re nodding wisely, since we’ve seen for two hundred years how automation
is slowly replacing manual labor. We’ve also bought into the concept that as manual
jobs are eliminated, high-end knowledge jobs are created. After all, someone
has to design and build and program and supervise all those smart machines,
right? I nodded wisely too as I started this book.
But
we should all stop nodding right now, because Ford makes a completely convincing
case for why things are vastly different now. This is not your grandfather’s industrial
revolution.
First
of all, this is not a slow replacement process any more, with workers having
time to retrain and reposition themselves; this is a rapid disruption that will
be impossible for our workforce to adapt to, and with far fewer (if any at all)
new jobs created to replace all those lost. Retraining is futile if your next
job is also being replaced at the same pace as the last. And it’s not in the
far future; it’s happening right now with machines that are not in the planning
stages. They are up and running in the workplace, like Watson and its countless
unnamed little siblings.
Second
of all we’re no longer looking at blue collar, low-wage, repetitive jobs that
are relatively easy to replicate with machines. We are talking about all
categories of knowledge work, no matter how unstructured or creative they may
be. We are talking about YOUR job being replaced, right now.
Ford
gives example after example of jobs that are on the cusp of being done by
machines, so many of them jobs that we would have never thought could be done
by automation: physicians and the above-mentioned radiologists, airline pilots,
writers and artists, engineers and designers, computer programmers, managers. This
is not speculation; he’s describing a trend that is well under way.
The
economic impacts of all this are the most disturbing aspects of the book. Automation
is a profit-driven imperative, since in every case the replacement of people
with machines will ultimately produce greater productivity at far lower costs. Cheaper/Better/Faster
is a triple play that no company can resist and the robots have reached the
tipping point over their human competition in all three categories. In no case
does retaining a human workforce produce a product or a service that justifies
the higher costs. More and more highly trained people will be put out of work,
competing for a diminishing number of jobs and Ford shows that this applies now
as much in the service economy as it ever did in manufacturing. Company owners
and investors will be the few left still in the driver’s seats, which will only
increase income inequality. Ford discards the metaphor of a career ladder and
replaces it with a career pyramid: there is only so much room at the top.
Machines
will ultimately design and build themselves, and further the process of
automation. Moore’s Law will be relentless. There are already learning systems
that can master even the most complex and unstructured jobs, simply by
observing how experts do them. The process by which Watson will assist (then
replace) the radiologists is one that will be repeated over and over again.
As
I read the book, I kept hoping that Ford would provide a solution that would
help us avoid this depressing future; after all, the last chapter was entitled
“Toward a New Economic Paradigm.” But I hoped in vain. Ford’s best idea is for
the government to establish a minimum guaranteed income for all citizens – a
socialist-sounding proposal that I think has little hope of emerging from our
currently toxic political environment. Ford’s other alternatives are no better.
This
is not a problem that can be kicked down the road to a future generation, who,
we may hope, will somehow solve it. If you’re young or in mid-career, this
trend will impact your life. It will surely impact the futures of all our
children.
The
danger of a jobless future should be part of our national debate. The way
technology impacts our society and lives is the responsibility of everyone who
works in IT, and I consider this issue to be the most serious of our times.
Every
technologist should read “Rise of the Robots”, and so should everyone else.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is the book on Amazon, but keep your local bookstore in business and buy it there.
5 comments:
Efficiency is a four letter word or Amazon is evil. I recommend a book called Manna by Marshall Brain for how it happens and two altenative realities.
I've thinking this myself for quite a while. All those "robots" (aka automation), are taking jobs, paying jobs, that have provided us the income to purchase all those goods and services the robots are creating. Purchasing those goods and services is an economic driver. Small problem there.
Disturbing to think about a future when so many smart and creative people are left without an outlet (usually their jobs) to contribute their talents to society. Intelligensia are not noted for standing down complacently. Thank you for recommending yet another provocative book.
It seems to me that one of the most fearsome instances of the robot rise is in drone warfare. Couldn't the human decision-making link be removed, and drones would become almost completely autonomous, deciding which targets meet the specification? A slippery slope that began...who knows when? When Australopithecus picked up a club, perhaps. On that gloomy note, I will just say, thanks for the blog.
In 1970 Alvin Toffler first popularized this phenomenon with his best-selling "Future Shock." The key point you are making, quite correctly, is our modern society may endure so much disruption so quickly that there will not be time for individuals, governments or private institutions to adapt. There are western societies today that are suffering from very high percentages of unemployment (Greece is the obvious example) which may not be part of an economic cycle, but a permanent decaying condition. If the elite class that controls the computers leaves everyone (even highly educated doctors) to fend for themselves, that will be untenable. I can't avoid recommending the classic short novel by H.G. Wells, "The Time Machine," where the future he depicts holds up very well as an allegory for our times.
Post a Comment